enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]

  3. Anti-Marcionite prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Marcionite_Prologues

    The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]

  4. File : Start of the 'Monarchian' prologue to the Apocalyse ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Start_of_the...

    This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.

  5. Canonical criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_criticism

    A portion of the Leningrad Codex.Although the Hebrew Bible is the result of a developmental process, canonical criticism focuses on the final form of the text.. Canonical criticism, sometimes called canon criticism or the canonical approach, is a way of interpreting the Bible that focuses on the text of the biblical canon itself as a finished product.

  6. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  7. Bible Historiale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_Historiale

    Describing his own role as translating and "ordering" the text, Guyart censored or omitted portions of the Bible that "should not, according to reason, be translated", rearranged materials "so that the laity might find them better ordered" and, on occasion, added further commentaries of his own or from other sources to produce the work known as ...

  8. Stuttgart Vulgate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuttgart_Vulgate

    Concordance to the Vulgate Bible for the Stuttgart Vulgate. The Weber-Gryson edition includes Jerome's prologues [4] and the Eusebian Canons. It does not, however, provide any of the other prefatory material often found in medieval Bible manuscripts, such as chapter headings, some of which are included in the large editions of Oxford and Rome.

  9. Urtext (biblical studies) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urtext_(Biblical_studies)

    The inter-relationship between various significant ancient manuscripts of the Old Testament (some identified by their siglum). The lowermost text "(lost)" would be the urtext. In biblical studies, the Urtext is the theorized original, uniform text of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), preceding both the Septuagint (LXX) and the Masoretic Text (MT).