enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Patent misuse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_misuse

    In United States patent law, patent misuse is a patent holder's use of a patent to restrain trade beyond enforcing the exclusive rights that a lawfully obtained patent provides. [1] If a court finds that a patent holder committed patent misuse, the court may rule that the patent holder has lost the right to enforce the patent.

  3. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v...

    Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2006) Holding; A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. Court membership; Chief ...

  4. Mercoid cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercoid_cases

    The Mercoid cases—Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co., 320 U.S. 661 (1944), and Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 320 U.S. 680 (1944)—are 1944 patent tie-in misuse and antitrust decisions of the United States Supreme Court. These companion cases are said to have reached the "high-water mark of the patent misuse ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Once a patent has expired, the benefits of the invention are to be enjoyed by the public and may not be extended by trademark. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corporation of America: 306 U.S. 618: 1939: Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co. 314 U.S. 488: 1942: Patent misuse. United States v. Univis Lens Co. 316 U.S. 241: 1942

  6. Button-Fastener case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Button-Fastener_case

    The license would be no defense to a suit for infringement by a use in excess of its terms. The patentee has the exclusive right of use, except in so far as he has parted with it by his license. The essence of the monopoly conferred by the grant of letters patent is the exclusive right to use the invention or discovery described in the patent.

  7. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenith_Radio_Corp._v...

    Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. is the caption of several United States Supreme Court patent–related decisions, the most significant of which is a 1969 patent–antitrust and patentmisuse decision concerning the levying of patent royalties on unpatented products.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_Industries,_Inc._v...

    Leatherman Tool Group made a multifunction tool that was arguably uniquely new at the time of its introduction. In 1995, Cooper Industries, a competing toolmaker, decided to enter the same market niche with a similar tool. The competing product was originally to be nearly identical to the original, save a few cosmetic changes.