Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Thayananthan Baskaran. Arbitration in Malaysia: A Commentary on the Malaysian Arbitration Act. Kluwer Law International. 2019. Google. Sundra Rajoo and W S W Davidson. The Arbitration Act 2005: UNCITRAL Model Law as Applied in Malaysia. Sweet & Maxwell Asia. 2007. Reviewed at (2008) 10 Asian Dispute Review 32 and (2007) 15 IIUM Law Journal 149
In contract law, an arbitration clause is a clause in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through an arbitration process. Although such a clause may or may not specify that arbitration occur within a specific jurisdiction, it always binds the parties to a type of resolution outside the courts, and is therefore considered a kind of forum selection clause.
In contract law, a forum selection clause (sometimes called a dispute resolution clause, choice of court clause, governing law clause, jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause, depending upon its form) in a contract with a conflict of laws element allows the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum.
The Sulu heirs started an ad hoc arbitration process regarding the 1878 agreement in Spain on 30 July 2019. Malaysia did not consent to the arbitration process, insisting that the proper venue to resolve the dispute was the Courts of Malaysia, Malaysia being the successor to the British Colonial administration in the relevant territory. [7]
High-Low Arbitration, or Bracketed Arbitration, is an arbitration wherein the parties to the dispute agree in advance the limits within which the arbitral tribunal must render its award. It is only generally useful where liability is not in dispute, and the only issue between the parties is the amount of compensation.
International arbitration is an alternative to local court procedures. International arbitration has different rules than domestic arbitration, [6] and has its own non-country-specific standards of ethical conduct. [7] The process may be more limited than typical litigation and forms a hybrid between the common law and civil law legal systems. [8]
Disney said the binding arbitration clause for the tickets applies to anyone he bought tickets for, according to the response. In a response to Disney's filing, Piccolo's attorneys rebutted the ...
A review of disputed cases in China found that from 2000 to 2011, the Supreme People's Court upheld the refusal to enforce the arbitration agreement in 17 cases due to a provision in Article V of the convention (China has an automatic appeal system to the highest court, so this includes all such refusals).