Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This leads the stance on certain scientific topics to be very different across the board as perceptions vary from person to person, this is the ultimate reason why scientific controversy exists, to begin with. Science-related controversies all follow similar characteristics. Conflict over personal beliefs, values, and interests; Public perception
1699–1716 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy: Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz 1949 proof of the prime number theorem : Atle Selberg and/or Paul Erdős [ 31 ] [ 32 ] 2002–2003 proof of the Poincaré conjecture : Grigori Perelman or Shing-Tung Yau [ 33 ]
While it's not clear whether the pope has actually read Muraresku's book, the Vatican did recently host a conference featuring a talk on psychedelic science. In September, a controversy broke out ...
Gupta had used fossil images from earlier records and fossil specimens from other parts of the world claiming that he found them at the Himalayas. [244] Examination of his publications between 1969 and 1988 confirmed the misconduct. [245] It was recorded as the "greatest scientific fraud of the century". [246]
Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress is a 2018 book written by Canadian-American cognitive scientist Steven Pinker. It argues that the Enlightenment values of reason, science, and humanism have brought progress, and that health, prosperity, safety, peace, and happiness have tended to rise worldwide.
These include human motivation, knowledge, justification, meaning, and truth. The distinction arises in many areas of debate with similar but distinct meanings. Internal–external distinction is a distinction used in philosophy to divide an ontology into two parts: an internal part concerning observation related to philosophy, and an external ...
Human behavior is the potential and expressed capacity (mentally, physically, and socially) of human individuals or groups to respond to internal and external stimuli throughout their life. Behavior is driven by genetic and environmental factors that affect an individual.
Mapping controversies (MC) is an academic course taught in science studies, [1] stemming from the writings of the French sociologist and philosopher Bruno Latour. [2] MC focuses exclusively on the controversies surrounding scientific knowledge rather than the established scientific facts or outcomes.