Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A three-judge motions panel of the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on the federal government's motion for a stay on February 7. The panel consisted of Judges William Canby, Richard Clifton, and Michelle Friedland. [41] The arguments were live streamed as is typical for the 9th Circuit but rare in other federal courts. [42]
By contrast, in the Ninth Circuit it is impractical for 29 or more judges to take part in a single oral argument and deliberate on a decision en masse. The court thus provides for a limited en banc review by the Chief Judge and a panel of 10 randomly selected judges. [16]
The 9th Circuit said it will hear oral arguments on Feb. 3, with a ruling expected later next year. (Reporting by Mike Scarcella; Editing by David Bario, Rod Nickel, David Gregorio and Jonathan Oatis)
In 2006, he was one of the judges on the panel that upheld the imprisonment of journalist Josh Wolf. [5]On February 7, 2017, Clifton along with fellow Ninth Circuit judges William Canby and Michelle Friedland heard oral arguments on a motion from the Trump administration to stay the temporary restraining order in State of Washington v.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday will hear oral arguments in former President Trump’s appeal of a jury’s verdict finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll.
Gabriel Patrick Sanchez (born 1976) is an American lawyer who has served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit since 2022. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] He served as an associate judge of the California Court of Appeal from 2018 to 2022.
The Moores appealed the Ninth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court on February 21, 2023. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2023. [3] In the summer of 2023, Justice Samuel Alito was interviewed for The Wall Street Journal by David B. Rivkin, an attorney in this case. [4]
Oral arguments were heard on March 19, 2024. The case was argued, on behalf of Diaz, by Jeffrey L. Fisher and, on behalf of the United States, by Matthew Guarnieri. On June 20, 2024, the court ruled 6-3 that the expert testimony of "most people" is not an opinion on the "defendant" and is admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence.