Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
While a logical argument is a non sequitur if, and only if, it is invalid, the term "non sequitur" typically refers to those types of invalid arguments which do not constitute formal fallacies covered by particular terms (e.g., affirming the consequent). In other words, in practice, "non sequitur" refers to an unnamed formal fallacy.
A non sequitur can denote an abrupt, illogical, or unexpected turn in plot or dialogue by including a relatively inappropriate change in manner. A non sequitur joke sincerely has no explanation, but it reflects the idiosyncrasies, mental frames and alternative world of the particular comic persona.
The "normal speech" section says non sequitur describes "a statement in which premise and conclusion are totally unrelated" (my emphasis), but in all of the examples the premise and conclusion are very obviously related: phones are related to image, pet food is related to dogs, and rain is related to sun. In the first example, the article ...
Non sequitur fallacy – where the conclusion does not logically follow the premise. [8] Masked-man fallacy (illicit substitution of identicals) – the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one. [9]
For example, in UK, people speak of "Crown property" meaning property belonging to the State. Similarly: "The White House had no comment to make." Minor premise – statement in an argument. Moral reasoning – reasoning employed in rhetoric that determines a conclusion based on evidence; used in issues of ethics, religion, economics, and politics.
1 Examples. 2 See also. 3 References. ... This argument combines judgmental language with non sequitur and appeal to authority. ... a non-profit organization.
A combination of "nut" (i.e., insane person) and "cherry picking", as well as a play on the word "nitpicking," nut picking refers to intentionally seeking out extremely fringe, non-representative statements from or members of an opposing group and parading these as evidence of that entire group's incompetence or irrationality.
Example 1: A and B are debating as to whether criticizing indirectly has any merit in general. A : There is no point in people ranting on social media about politics; the president is not going to read it anyway.