Ads
related to: us patent application process examples chart of cases and problemsbenchmarkguide.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. General Electric Co. - Supreme Court, 1926. A patentee who has granted a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product. Ex Parte Quayle - 1935. Decision related to the patent application process.
Schillinger v. United States: 155 U.S. 163: 1894: Patent infringement claim against the United States cannot be asserted. Black Diamond Coal Mining Company v. Excelsior Coal Company: 156 U.S. 611: 1895: Consolidated Electric Light Co v. McKeesport Light Co: 159 U.S. 465: 1895: Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Medart: 158 U.S. 68: 1895: Boyden ...
The patent application in question US05/602,463 [4] was filed on behalf of inventors Diehr and Lutton in 1975. The application claimed a "[process] for molding raw, uncured synthetic rubber into cured precision products." The process of curing synthetic rubber depends on a number of factors including time, temperature and thickness of the mold.
Apple Inc. litigation (multiple, multinational cases) Apple v. HTC (US, 2010) Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (multiple, multinational cases, ongoing [citation needed]) Ariad v. Lilly (US, 2006) Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc. (US, 2005) Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad ...
United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. United States v. Huck Mfg. Co. United States v. Krasnov; United States v. Line Material Co. United States v. Masonite Corp. United States v. Motion Picture Patents Co. United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc. United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. United States v. United States Gypsum Co. United States v. Univis Lens Co ...
As another example, a European patent application consists of "a request for the grant of a European patent, a description of the invention, one or more claims, any drawings referred to in the description or claims, and an abstract." [10] Rule 42 EPC specifies what the description of a European patent application should contain in more details.
Ads
related to: us patent application process examples chart of cases and problemsbenchmarkguide.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month