enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Source reliability falls on a spectrum: No source is 'always reliable' or 'always unreliable' for everything. However, some sources provide stronger or weaker support for a given statement. Editors must use their judgment to draw the line between usable and inappropriate sources for each statement.

  4. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    Flags of the World has been written off as an unreliable source in general. Although some of its pages might refer to reliable sources, it is self-published content without editorial oversight, and the hosts "disclaim any responsibility about the veracity and accuracy of the contents of the website." 1 2 Flickr 📌: 1 2 3: 2020

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.

  7. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Secondary sources can be unreliable, biased, self-serving and self-published. According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, reliable sources have most, if not all, of the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published by a reputable publishing house, rather than by the author(s).

  8. Wikipedia:When sources are wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_sources_are...

    The second option was settled on at least provisionally, and then, coincidentally, a new reliable source came out that did question the arrest, a deus ex machina that thankfully resolved the dispute but annoyingly prevented the possibility of a full case study into the extreme edge case of an article where 100% of sources may be wrong. As of ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Reliability should be judged relative to the statement being sourced. Any source can be a reliable source for its own opinion. However, not all sources have relevant opinions. Please do not give the opinions of sources undue weight. Making a statement about a fact other than someone's opinion requires a higher degree of reliability.