Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) [1] [2] is a scoring and interpretive method to be used with the Rorschach inkblot test. [3] This system is being developed by several members of the Rorschach Research Council, a group established by John Exner to advance the research on the Comprehensive System, the most widely used scoring system for the Rorschach.
Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it.
The International Journal of Forecasting used opt-in result-blind peer review and pre-accepted articles from before 1986 [114] through 1996/1997. [101] [115] The journal Applied Psychological Measurement offered an opt-in "advance publication review" process from 1989 to 1996, ending use after only 5 papers were submitted. [101] [116]
Analysis of responses is recorded by the test administrator using a tabulation and scoring sheet and, if required, a separate location chart. [ 26 ] The general goal of the test is to provide data about cognition and personality variables such as motivations , response tendencies, cognitive operations, affectivity , and personal/interpersonal ...
However, systematic reviews focus on answering one or a few specific questions, so that complementing with other sources may be necessary to more broadly cover a topic. Core basic science journals include such publications as Science, Nature, and subject-specific journals published by professional associations.
Intervention studies where a group with low scores in the construct is tested, taught the construct, and then re-measured can demonstrate a test's construct validity. If there is a significant difference pre-test and post-test, which are analyzed by statistical tests, then this may demonstrate good construct validity. [23]
Author-level metrics are citation metrics that measure the bibliometric impact of individual authors, researchers, academics, and scholars. Many metrics have been developed that take into account varying numbers of factors (from only considering the total number of citations, to looking at their distribution across papers or journals using statistical or graph-theoretic principles).
The Journal of 100% Reliable Factual Information might have a reputation for "predatory" behavior, which includes questionable business practices and/or peer-review processes that raise concerns about the reliability of their journal articles. [11] [12]