Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
“I don’t know who to be more frustrated with — SEIU or CalHR,” said one member who plans to vote against ratification. California state workers share mixed feelings on SEIU 1000 deal. Will ...
SEIU Local 1000 has long pushed for its members to receive significant raises but the union’s proposal marks an unprecedented ask. The last contract gave Local 1000 members a 7% pay raise over ...
When will California state employees see pay raises? Here’s why salary changes take so long. Maya Miller. December 6, 2023 at 5:00 AM ... SEIU Local 1000, nor the other law enforcement union, ...
SEIU Local 1000 - (Local 1000) - Represents about 95,000 rank and file civil service state employees in California. Association of California State Supervisors - (ACSS) - Represents about 6,500 state civil service managers, supervisors and confidential employees who are excluded from collective bargaining.
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is a labor union representing almost 1.9 million workers [2] in over 100 occupations in the United States and Canada. [3] SEIU is focused on organizing workers in three sectors: healthcare (over half of members work in the healthcare field), including hospital, home care and nursing home workers; public services (government employees, including law ...
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, 567 U.S. 298 (2012), is a United States constitutional law case. The United States Supreme Court held in a 7–2 decision that Dianne Knox and other non-members of the Service Employees International Union did not receive the required notice of a $12 million assessment the union charged them to raise money for the union's political fund.
Within the genre of paid time off, employers are eyeing expanding parental leave, bereavement leave, and caregiving leave in particular. Around 86% of companies in the U.S. currently provide ...
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.