Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The public trust doctrine, as discussed by the Court in this judgment was a part of the law of the land. The prior approval granted by the Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest and the lease-deed dated 11.04.1994 in favour of the Motel were quashed.
The Public Trust Doctrine in Motion. PTDIM, LLC. ISBN 978-0-615-24111-1. Velozo de Melo Bento, Lucas (November 14, 2009). "Searching for Intergenerational Green Solutions: The Relevance of the Public Trust Doctrine to Environmental Preservation". Common Law Review (11): 7– 13. SSRN 1709104. Wood, Mary Christina (2014).
The Act defines how the author of the trust could create a trust and assign trustees and assign his monetary assets to be controlled by the trust. This trust should have a clear definition of the following: [3] [1] Intention by the author to create the trust; Purpose of the trust; The beneficiary of the monetary assets controlled by the trust
Waddell’s Lessee, that the Supreme Court ratified the public trust doctrine. [2] Still, Illinois Central has been referred to as "the Lodestar in American Public Trust Law". [2] As of 2010, the courts of 35 states had cited Illinois Central in their articulation of the public trust doctrine. [2]
Trust law in India is mainly codified in the Indian Trusts Act of 1882, which came into force on 1 March 1882. It extends to the whole of India except for the state of Jammu and Kashmir and Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian law follows principles of English law in most areas of law, but the law of trusts is a notable exception.
Mary Christina Wood (born 1962) is an Oregon Philip H. Knight Professor of Law and author, best known for her writings advocating for the use of the public trust doctrine to compel government action on climate change. Wood originated the approach, called atmospheric trust litigation, "to hold governments worldwide accountable for reducing ...
That the doctrine of public trust requires the government to show a public benefit to any transfer of public property into private hands, and that the CTEA violates this doctrine by withdrawing material from the public domain.
Ban on dissenting media under the Section 9 (1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 struck down as unconstitutional. This in-turn led to formulation of the 1st amendment of the Constitution of India which clarified public order can form grounds for reasonable restrictions of free speech. Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh ...