Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The opinions of specialists and recognized experts are more likely to be reliable and to reflect a significant viewpoint. [note 4] If the statement is not authoritative, attribute the opinion to the author in the text of the article and do not represent it as fact. Reviews for books, movies, art, etc. can be opinion, summary, or scholarly pieces.
The official print version is available from the Government Publishing Office. The Factbook is available in website and downloadable formats. It provides a two- to three-page summary of the demographics , geography , communications, government , economy , and military of 266 international entities, [ 2 ] including U.S.-recognized countries ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Avoid stating facts as opinions. ... forms of historical negationism that are considered by more reliable sources to either ...
Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must be published, on Wikipedia meaning made available to the public in some form. [f] Unpublished material is not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are ...
What is the difference between asserting a fact and asserting an opinion? The text of Wikipedia articles should assert facts, but not assert opinions as fact.. When a statement is a fact (e.g., information that is accepted as true and about which there is no serious dispute), it should be asserted using Wikipedia's own voice without in-text attribution.
Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
She wanted to give students an easier way to determine what sources are credible. [2] One of the other tests that came before the CRAAP test is the SAILS test: S tandardized A ssessment of I nformation L iteracy S kills, created in 2002 by a group of librarians at Kent State University as an assessment for students' information literacy skills.