Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) conducted an investigation of Princo's alleged infringement of U.S. Philips Corporation's patents by the importation of optical discs—recordable compact discs ("CD-Rs") and rewritable compact discs ("CD-RWs") (collectively "CD-R/RWs"). Those devices and related technology were developed in the 1980s ...
Expulsions under 42 U.S.C. 265 (Title 42 expulsions) from the southwest U.S. border [1] A Title 42 expulsion is the removal by the U.S. government of a person who had recently been in a country where a communicable disease was present. The extent of authority for contagion-related expulsions is set out by law in 42 U.S.C. § 265.
admitting evidence which should have been excluded under the rules of evidence, excluding evidence which a party was entitled to have admitted, giving an incorrect legal instruction to a jury, failure to declare a mistrial when continuing with trial amounts to a denial of due process, or
Critics of the patent misuse defense argue it is anachronistic, that it should be limited by the antitrust rule of reason, and that it has been narrowed to oblivion since 1988 by court rulings like Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission.
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC or I.T.C. [3]) is an agency of the United States federal government that advises the legislative and executive branches on matters of trade. It is an independent, bipartisan entity that analyzes trade issues such as tariffs and competitiveness and publishes reports.
Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that a federal agency's decision to not take an enforcement action is presumptively unreviewable by the courts under section 701(a)(2) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In 2011, the Board published its final rule, which set the maximum transaction fee at $0.21 plus 0.05% (5 basis points). [1] Several merchant groups challenged the rule in 2011 in NACS v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, saying that the fee cap had been set too high.
The United States Court of International Trade (case citations: Ct. Int'l Trade) is a U.S. federal court that adjudicates civil actions arising out of U.S. customs and international trade laws. [1]