Ad
related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles by name listcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- State Court Record Search
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Full case name: Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles; Christopher Boehr, Real Party in Interest: Citation(s) 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P.3d 1100: Holding; An arbitration agreement with a class-action waiver was unenforceable on the grounds of unconscionability: Court membership; Chief Justice: Ronald M. George: Associate Justices
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County is the California Superior Court located in Los Angeles County. It is the largest single unified trial court in the United States. The Superior Court operates 36 courthouses throughout the county. Currently, the Presiding Judge is Sergio C. Tapia II and David W. Slayton is the Executive Officer/Clerk of ...
An important sidelight was the filing of insider trading charges against whistleblower Dirks. The ensuing case of Raymond L. Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court where Dirks was finally acquitted. The case has been termed historic in helping to define insider trading, as well as the treatment of ...
In a tentative settlement, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has agreed to repay customers who were charged too much for sewer service from May 2016 to June 2022.
In October, U.S. officials said TD bank employees received at least $57,000 in gift cards in 2020 and 2021 from one criminal who moved more than $400 million in transactions through the bank.
City of Los Angeles Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that employers cannot charge women more for pension benefits, despite women living longer than men, on average, and therefore receiving more retirement benefits.
New Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman's office is pushing back against a "meritless" claim of a potential conflict of interest in the Menendez brothers’ case amid reports that their ...
Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified one of the requirements for imposing liability on a municipality for violations of a federal right, in lawsuits brought under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1983).
Ad
related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles by name listcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month