enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cambridge_Grammar_of...

    The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CamGEL [n 1]) is a descriptive grammar of the English language. Its primary authors are Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Huddleston was the only author to work on every chapter. It was published by Cambridge University Press in 2002 and has been cited more than 8,000 times. [1]

  3. Rodney Huddleston - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_Huddleston

    For some time, Huddleston ran a project under Halliday in the Communications Research Centre at The University of London called the “OSTI Programme in the Linguistic Properties of Scientific English.” [5] (OSTI was the UK government's Office for Scientific and Technical Information.) [6] As a student of Halliday's, Huddleston was a proponent of Systemic Functional Grammar, [5] but as his ...

  4. Geoffrey K. Pullum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_K._Pullum

    Geoffrey Keith Pullum (/ ˈ p ʊ l əm /; born 8 March 1945) is a British and American linguist specialising in the study of English.Pullum has published over 300 articles and books on various topics in linguistics, including phonology, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, computational linguistics, and philosophy of language.

  5. CGEL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CGEL

    A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language by Quirk et al., published in 1985 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston and Pullum, published in 2002 Topics referred to by the same term

  6. Talk : The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Cambridge_Grammar...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  7. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Comprehensive_Grammar_of...

    In 1988, Rodney Huddleston published a very critical review. [3] He wrote: [T]here are some respects in which it is seriously flawed and disappointing. A number of quite basic categories and concepts do not seem to have been thought through with sufficient care; this results in a remarkable amount of unclarity and inconsistency in the analysis, and in the organization of the grammar.

  8. Talk:English grammar/English grammar old - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:English_grammar...

    Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Longman. Huddleston, R. & G. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, CUP. The main argument given by Huddleston and Pullum (pp 209–10) that English does not have a future tense is that "will" is a modal verb, both in its grammar

  9. History of English grammars - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_English_grammars

    Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey Pullum: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. 1842 pages. [59] 2006. Ronald Carter and Michael McCarthy: Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. 973 pages. [60] 2011. Bas Aarts: Oxford Modern English Grammar. 410 pages.