enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: is medline a reliable source of medicine for cancer research

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    [20] [21]) Other indications that a journal article may not be reliable are its publication in a journal that is not indexed in the bibliographic database MEDLINE, [22] or its content being outside the journal's normal scope (for instance, an article on the efficacy of a new cancer treatment in a psychiatric journal or the surgical techniques ...

  3. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    A type of source that is good for scientific information is not usually as reliable for political information, and vice versa. Since Wikipedia's readers may make medical decisions based on information found in our articles, [ 1 ] we want to use high-quality sources when writing about biomedical information.

  4. MEDLINE - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEDLINE

    MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online) is a bibliographic database of life sciences and biomedical information. It includes bibliographic information for articles from academic journals covering medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, and health care.

  5. PubMed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed

    PubMed is a free database including primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health maintains the database as part of the Entrez system of information retrieval.

  6. Wikipedia talk : Identifying reliable sources (medicine ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying...

    Research papers are primary sources; although they normally contain previous-work sections that are secondary sources, these sections are typically less reliable than reviews. A general narrative review of a subject by an expert in the field makes a good secondary source that can be used to cover various aspects of a subject within a Wikipedia ...

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  8. Wikipedia:CARL Medical Editing Initiative/Fall 2020/Reliable ...

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Fall_2020/Reliable_Sources

    Examples of non-acceptable sources: Research papers, including clinical trial papers, are generally avoided, as they are communicating new findings, which may or may not be or become accepted knowledge in the field. Anything published by a predatory publisher or marginal journal (for the latter, being MEDLINE indexed is typically a minimum).

  9. Wikipedia talk : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying...

    Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Identifying reliable sources (medicine). PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

  1. Ad

    related to: is medline a reliable source of medicine for cancer research