enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Metaethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaethics

    In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, ground, and meaning of moral judgment, ethical belief, or values.It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually contentious, situations).

  3. Outline of ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_ethics

    Metaethics or moral epistemology – concerns the nature of moral statements, that is, it studies what ethical terms and theories actually refer to. Moral syncretism – the attempt to reconcile disparate or contradictory moral beliefs, often while melding the ethical

  4. Category:Metaethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Metaethics

    Normative ethics; Metaethics; Applied ethics; Ethicists; Ethics literature; Concepts in ethics; Ethics theories Subcategories. This category has the following 2 ...

  5. Moral intellectualism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_intellectualism

    Moral intellectualism or ethical intellectualism is a view in meta-ethics according to which genuine moral knowledge must take the form of arriving at discursive moral judgements about what one should do. [1] One way of understanding this is that doing what is right is a reflection of what any being knows is right. [2]

  6. Expressivism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expressivism

    In meta-ethics, expressivism is a theory about the meaning of moral language.According to expressivism [citation needed], sentences that employ moral terms – for example, "It is wrong to torture an innocent human being" – are not descriptive or fact-stating; moral terms such as "wrong", "good", or "just" do not refer to real, in-the-world properties.

  7. Non-cognitivism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-cognitivism

    Non-cognitivism is the meta-ethical view that ethical sentences do not express propositions (i.e., statements) and thus cannot be true or false (they are not truth-apt). A noncognitivist denies the cognitivist claim that "moral judgments are capable of being objectively true, because they describe some feature of the world."

  8. J. L. Mackie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Mackie

    He made significant contributions to ethics, the philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and the philosophy of language. Mackie had influential views on metaethics, including his defence of moral scepticism and his sophisticated defence of atheism. He wrote six books.

  9. R. M. Hare - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._M._Hare

    While Hare was primarily interested in meta-ethics, he also made some important contributions to the fields of political philosophy and applied ethics. Among his essays within these fields those on the morality of slavery, abortion [19] and the Golden Rule, and on demi-vegetarianism have received the most attention.