enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Motorcycle_Ass'n_v...

    American Motorcycle Association v. Superior Court, 20 Cal. 3d 578 (1978), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that first adopted a comparative fault regime for apportionment of liability among multiple tortfeasors for negligence in California. [1]

  3. Comparative responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_responsibility

    Comparative responsibility (known as comparative fault in some jurisdictions) is a doctrine of tort law that compares the fault of each party in a lawsuit for a single injury. Comparative responsibility may apply to intentional torts as well as negligence and encompasses the doctrine of comparative negligence .

  4. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  5. Comparative negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_negligence

    Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.

  6. Contributory negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_negligence

    The doctrine of contributory negligence was dominant in U.S. jurisprudence in the 19th and 20th century. [3] The English case Butterfield v.Forrester is generally recognized as the first appearance, although in this case, the judge held the plaintiff's own negligence undermined their argument that the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury. [3]

  7. 'Conditions' should be placed on California wildfire aid ...

    www.aol.com/conditions-placed-california...

    Back in 2019, Trump went on to lambaste California and Newsom for continually reaching out to Washington for aid to combat the fires. "No more," Trump said on X. "Get your act together Governor.

  8. Assumption of risk - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_risk

    In comparative negligence jurisdictions, secondary assumption of risk is applied as a factor that the jury can consider in apportioning fault, rather than a complete defense. [6] The California Supreme Court explained the difference between primary and secondary assumption of risk (under California law) as follows:

  9. California Leaders Are Wrong to Fault the Trump ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/california-leaders-wrong-fault...

    Far too many Americans are suffering due to the catastrophic wildfires burning across California and the Pacific Northwest, with many lives lost and property ruined. According to the most recent ...