enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

  3. Rumsfeld v. Padilla - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfeld_v._Padilla

    Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which José Padilla , an American citizen, sought habeas corpus relief against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld , as a result of his detention by the military as an " unlawful combatant ."

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) The federal government has the power to detain those it designates as enemy combatants, including United States citizens, but detainees that are United States citizens must have the rights of due process and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority. Hamdan v.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 542

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Elk Grove Unified School Dist. v. Newdow: 542 U.S. 1: 2004: Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance: 542 U.S. 55: 2004: United States v.

  6. Yaser Esam Hamdi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaser_Esam_Hamdi

    Yaser Esam Hamdi (born September 26, 1980) is a former American citizen who was captured in Afghanistan in 2001. The United States government claims that he was fighting with the Taliban against U.S. and Afghan Northern Alliance forces.

  7. Military tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunals_in_the...

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an ...

  8. José Padilla (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_Padilla_(criminal)

    On February 20, 2004, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the government's appeal. The Supreme Court heard the case, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, in April 2004, but on June 28, 2004, the court dismissed the petition on technical grounds because It was improperly filed in federal court in New York instead of South Carolina, where Padilla was being detained.

  9. Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combatant_Status_Review...

    The CSRTs were established July 7, 2004 by order of U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz [4] after U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [5] and Rasul v. Bush [6] and were coordinated through the Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants.