Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It also includes the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence as expressed in human rights documents. In the exercise of this right, they should take into account the needs of their living and future children and their responsibilities towards the community.
Reproductive Justice is therefore "based in the human right to make personal decisions about one's life, and the obligation of government and society to ensure that the conditions are suitable for implementing one's decisions". [28] Thus, the focus is on structural and systemic changes that can support rights. [10]
They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence. [28] The area of sexual and reproductive rights is influenced by contextual cultural and social norms, socioeconomic factors and existing laws and regulations.
The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is a fundamental right. SECTION 2 The parental right to direct education includes the right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices within public schools for one's child.
For those divorced or widowed, the right to many of ex- or late spouse's benefits, including: Social Security pension; Veteran's pensions, indemnity compensation for service-connected deaths, medical care, and nursing home care, right to burial in veterans' cemeteries, educational assistance, and housing; survivor benefits for federal employees
The writer urges voters to vote yes on state Issue 1.
Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right— to make decisions concerning reproduction; to security in and control over their body; and not to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent. §13: No one may be subjected to slavery, servitude or forced labour.
In fact, Justice Caleb Stegall, writing for the majority, said that the dissenting justices wrongly accused the majority of ignoring past precedent, holding that the court has not identified a ...