Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Grayzone is an American news website and blog [6] described as fringe [12] and far-left by numerous sources. [23] It was founded and edited by American journalist Max Blumenthal. [3] The website was initially founded as The Grayzone Project [24] and was affiliated with AlterNet until early 2018. [9]
Max Blumenthal (born December 18, 1977) is an American journalist, author, blogger, and filmmaker. He was a writer for The Nation, AlterNet, [2] The Daily Beast, Al Akhbar, Mondoweiss, [3] and Media Matters for America, [4] [5] and has contributed to Al Jazeera English, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. [4]
The Grey Zone, an Italian film directed by Franco Bernini; The Grey Zone, a 2001 American film directed by Tim Blake Nelson; Greyzone, a 2018 Swedish-Danish drama series; The Grayzone, a news website founded by Max Blumenthal
The Grayzone has been accused of downplaying and defending the persecution of Uyghurs in China, of publishing conspiracy theories about Xinjiang, Syria and other regions, and of publishing pro-Russian propaganda and disinformation, especially during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. [19] [20] [21] kitklarenberg.com kitklarenberg.com Alive
Aaron Maté is a Canadian writer and journalist. [2] [3] He hosts the show Pushback with Aaron Maté on The Grayzone [2] and, as of January 2022, he fills in as a host on the Useful Idiots podcast. [4]
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Alternative media" U.S. political left – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ( June 2014 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this message )
The term grey-zone was coined by the United States Special Operations Command [10] [11] and published in a 2015 white paper. [12] The concept of the grey-zone is built on existing military strategies; however, information technology has created radical new spaces which have expanded what is possible.
EditorA makes an edit to an article, a “bad edit”, which does not adhere to a neutral point of view. This is by no means the first time that EditorA has made such an edit. EditorB reverts that edit, and on the discussion page (or in the edit summary) says. “I reverted your edit, EdA, because you are a POV-pusher, pushing a POV".