enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations. If you are new to editing and just need a general overview of how sources work, please visit the referencing for beginners help page.

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    a list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight; a list of biased or unbiased sources; a list of sources that are guaranteed to be 100% correct regardless of context; a list of every source that has been discussed; a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    But don't just throw your favorite paper into this list. A good citation describing their fact-checking operation would be helpful. Der Spiegel. According to the Columbia Journalism Review (2010) they have about eighty full-time fact-checkers – more than any other publication on the planet – and a very rigorous and well-organized operation. [1]

  5. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    "What are credible sources?: Fact checking". Guides at University of the Sunshine Coast. "Finding Reliable Sources: What is a Reliable Source?". University of Georgia. "Research Basics: How do I know if a source is credible?". Henry Buhl Library at Grove City College. "4 ways to differentiate a good source from a bad source".

  6. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...

  7. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    An American websites with focus on "political bias" and "factual reporting". [223] [224].Metabunk: A discussion forum setup by Mick West that covers such topics as pseudoscience, UFOs and the paranormal. The website also includes a forum, "Skydentify", where West invites people to send photos and videos of UFOs and supposed ghosts. NPR Fact Check.

  8. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    These media do not have adequate levels of editorial oversight or author credibility and lack assured persistence. An Internet forum with identifiable, expert and credible moderators with a declared corrective moderation policy may, exceptionally, be considered reliable for some topics. In this sense, where moderators act as editors to review ...

  9. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    She wanted to give students an easier way to determine what sources are credible. [2] One of the other tests that came before the CRAAP test is the SAILS test: S tandardized A ssessment of I nformation L iteracy S kills, created in 2002 by a group of librarians at Kent State University as an assessment for students' information literacy skills.