Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Scott G. Stewart is an American lawyer serving as the solicitor general for the state of Mississippi since 2021. He is widely known for arguing and winning in the landmark case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization before the U.S. Supreme Court .
[20] [21] [a] They are empowered by law to issue advisory opinions on questions of state law to statewide elected officials, legislators, state agencies, judges, and some local officials. [22] [23] They can also exercise powers under common law. [11] The Office of the Attorney General of Mississippi is split into 16 divisions. [14]
The Mississippi Bar instructed Balducci to ensure that Patterson was not being advertised to the public as one of the New Albany firm's attorneys, but additional allegations of the potential unauthorized practice of law led the bar to direct a committee to conduct a full investigation. In September the committee concluded that Patterson had ...
After gaining admission to the bar in Mississippi, he entered into private practice in Jackson with several other attorneys. They acted as local counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund. [3] He formed a law firm with several of those attorneys, Reuben Anderson, E.M. Nichols, and Melvyn R. Leventhal. [2]
The cases the court hears are assigned to it by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, and generally concern issues in which the law is already settled, but the facts are in dispute. Thus, contrary to federal procedure, Mississippi does not protect the common law right to a trial by jury, since it permits appellate review of facts found by a jury. [ 1 ]
State Auditor Shad White wants legislators to take a look at open meetings laws, open records and whistle blower policies this legislative session.
A federal appeals court struck down a Mississippi law that allowed mail-in ballots received within five days of the Nov. 5 election to be counted.. A panel of three judges determined Friday the ...
Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 2005. It concerned the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and the disparate impact theory.