Ad
related to: us v microsoft per curiam video game collection wall mount pcwalmart.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation , 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit .
Costello v. United States, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) (per curiam) Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968) (per curiam) Forgett v. United States, 390 U.S. 203 (1968) (per curiam) Ortega v. Michigan, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Stone v. United States, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Anderson v. Georgia, 390 U.S. 206 (1968) (per curiam) SEC ...
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, known on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as United States v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1186 (2018), was a data privacy case involving the extraterritoriality of law enforcement seeking electronic data under the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA), Title II of the Electronic Communications ...
Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 375 (1963) (per curiam) Ship-By-Truck Co. v. United States, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) (per curiam) Richards v. Pennsylvania, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) (per curiam) Atwood's Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) (per curiam) Drexel v. Ohio Pardon and Parole Comm'n, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) (per curiam ...
0–9. 1999 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States; 2000 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
The designation is stated at the beginning of the opinion. Single-line per curiam decisions are also issued without concurrence or dissent by a hung Supreme Court (a 4–4 decision), when the Court has a vacant seat. The notable exceptions to the usual characteristics for a per curiam decision are the cases of New York Times Co. v. United ...
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified at Google's trial, saying the search giant was using exclusive deals with publishers to lock up content used to train artificial intelligence.
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All ...
Ad
related to: us v microsoft per curiam video game collection wall mount pcwalmart.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month