Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On October 10, 1973, Agnew appeared before the federal court in Baltimore, and pleaded nolo contendere (no contest) to one felony charge, tax evasion, for the year 1967. Richardson agreed that there would be no further prosecution of Agnew, and released a 40-page summary of the evidence.
Spiro Agnew. Spiro Agnew is neither the largest tax cheat in history nor the most egregious. What lands him on this list is the consequences of his fraud: Agnew was forced out of the vice ...
On October 10, 1973, Vice President Spiro Agnew (a Republican) was forced to resign following a controversy over his personal taxes.Under the terms of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a vice presidential vacancy is filled when the president nominates a candidate who is confirmed by both houses of Congress.
Spiro T. Agnew resigned as Vice President of the United States and then, in federal court in Baltimore, pled no contest to charges of income tax evasion on $29,500 he received in 1967, while he was governor of Maryland. He was fined $10,000 and put on 3 years probation.
Uh, I’m doubtful Agnew had much integrity left after accepting bribes for about a decade. Dilbeck was indicted on tax evasion charges in Indianapolis in 1976 but received only a 60-day jail ...
Vice President Spiro Agnew (R-MD) was convicted of tax fraud stemming from bribery charges in Maryland and forced to resign. [199] Gerald R. Ford (R-MI) was nominated by Nixon to replace Agnew as vice president, becoming the first person appointed to the Vice Presidency under the terms of the 25th Amendment.
Tax evasion. In a secret grand jury held on March 13, 1931, Capone was charged with tax evasion and on June 5 of that same year, he was indicted by a federal grand jury for 22 counts of income tax ...
In 1973, Spiro Agnew resigned from his position as Vice President of the United States, pleading nolo contendere to charges of income tax evasion. [1] He was charged with having reported a joint income of $26,099 for both him and his wife in 1967, although their correct income had been $55,599. [ 6 ]