Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fuel consumption monitor from a 2006 Honda Airwave.The displayed fuel economy is 18.1 km/L (5.5 L/100 km; 43 mpg ‑US). A Briggs and Stratton Flyer from 1916. Originally an experiment in creating a fuel-saving automobile in the United States, the vehicle weighed only 135 lb (61.2 kg) and was an adaptation of a small gasoline engine originally designed to power a bicycle.
Official EPA fuel economy numbers are 27 mpg ‑US (8.7 L/100 km; 32 mpg ‑imp) city, 37 mpg ‑US (6.4 L/100 km; 44 mpg ‑imp) highway and 31 mpg ‑US (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp) combined for the manual while the dual clutch does 28 mpg ‑US (8.4 L/100 km; 34 mpg ‑imp) city, 37 mpg ‑US (6.4 L/100 km; 44 mpg ‑imp) highway and 31 mpg ...
For example, the fuel economy target for the 2012 Honda Fit with a footprint of 40 sq ft (3.7 m 2) is 36 miles per US gallon (6.5 L/100 km), equivalent to a published fuel economy of 27 miles per US gallon (8.7 L/100 km) (see #Calculations of MPG overestimated for information regarding the difference), and a Ford F-150 with its footprint of 65 ...
Fuel consumption is improved by approximately 11%, from 28 mpg ‑US (8.4 L/100 km; 34 mpg ‑imp) (combined city/highway) to 31 miles per US gallon (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp). [26] For the 2014 model year, the XV Crosstrek Hybrid was introduced in two trims, the XV Crosstrek Hybrid and Hybrid Touring.
[37] Car and Driver also tested a Fusion Hybrid and achieved no more than 34 mpg ‑US (6.9 L/100 km; 41 mpg ‑imp) over 300 miles (480 km) of driving, which was greater than the Camry Hybrid (31 miles per US gallon (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp)) or Nissan Altima Hybrid (32 miles per US gallon (7.4 L/100 km; 38 mpg ‑imp)) though not by the ...
This version of the 3.7 L (3,726 cc) features Twin Independent Variable Cam Timing (Ti-VCT); delivers 31 mpg ‑US (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp) highway mileage in the Mustang, and was the first production engine to deliver in excess of 300 hp (224 kW) and 30 mpg ‑US (7.8 L/100 km; 36 mpg ‑imp). [6]
The most efficient model had a highway fuel economy rating of 31 mpg ‑US (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp), [3] which was 45% better than the Liberty/Cherokee it replaced, [7] [8] and a driving range of 495 miles (797 km). Optional for the Cherokee was Chrysler's new 3.2 L Pentastar V6 engine.
The FFV has an average observed fuel consumption of 6.9 mpg ‑US (34.1 L/100 km; 8.3 mpg ‑imp), worse than the 8.2 mpg ‑US (28.7 L/100 km; 9.8 mpg ‑imp) of the LLVs and slightly better than the 6.3 mpg ‑US (37.3 L/100 km; 7.6 mpg ‑imp) of the commercial off-the-shelf Mercedes Metris vans that have been used to supplement the fleet ...