enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. GNU Lesser General Public License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public...

    The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary) software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components.

  3. Copyleft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

    Free-software licenses that use "weak" copyleft include the GNU Lesser General Public License and the Mozilla Public License. The GNU General Public License is an example of a license implementing strong copyleft. An even stronger copyleft license is the AGPL, which requires the publishing of the source code for software as a service use cases.

  4. License compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility

    License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.

  5. GNU General Public License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License

    The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) was created to have a weaker copyleft than the GPL, in that it does not require custom-developed source code (distinct from the LGPL licensed parts) to be made available under the same license terms.

  6. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    The FSF recommends at least "Compatible with GPL" and preferably copyleft. The OSI recommends a mix of permissive and copyleft licenses, the Apache License 2.0, 2- & 3-clause BSD license, GPL, LGPL, MIT license, MPL 2.0, CDDL and EPL.

  7. Open-source license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

    For example, Netscape drafted their own copyleft terms after rejecting permissive licenses for the Mozilla project. [32] The GPL remains the most popular license of this type, but there are other significant examples. The FSF has crafted the Lesser General Public License (LGPL) for libraries.

  8. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    In the mid-1980s, the GNU project produced copyleft free-software licenses for each of its software packages. An early such license (the "GNU Emacs Copying Permission Notice") was used for GNU Emacs in 1985, [5] which was revised into the "GNU Emacs General Public License" in late 1985, and clarified in March 1987 and February 1988.

  9. Software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_license

    Strong copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL), allow for no reuse in proprietary software, while weak copyleft, such as the related GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), do allow reuse in some circumstances. [3]