Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Alabama v. White, 496 US 325 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Fourth Amendment.The majority opinion ruled that anonymous tips can provide reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop provided that police can factually verify the circumstances asserted by the tip.
Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990) — anonymous tips with no indication of reliability of tip (also: Prado Navarette v. California) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990) — sobriety checkpoints; Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991) — "as long as police do not convey a message, etc" Minnesota v.
Case name Citation Date decided Keller v. State Bar of Cal. 496 U.S. 1: 1990: McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business Regulation
Weems v. United States: 217 U.S. 349 (1910) cruel and unusual punishment: Bailey v. Alabama: 219 U.S. 219 (1911) Advisory opinion overturned peonage laws Muskrat v. United States: 219 U.S. 346 (1911) Advisory opinion doctrine Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107 (1911) constitutionality of corporate income tax: United States v. Grimaud: 220 U ...
United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a warrant.
United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola; United States v. Grimaud; United States v. Johnson (1911) United States v. Nice; United States v. Oppenheimer; United States v. Quiver; United States v. Sandoval; United States v. Spearin; United States v. Terminal Railroad Association; United States v. Wheeler (1920) United States v ...
Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that an African American woman, Mary Hamilton, was entitled to the same courteous forms of address customarily reserved solely for whites in the Southern United States, [1] and that calling a black person by their first name in a formal context was "a form of racial discrimination".
No. Page Citation 1 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett: 556 U.S. 247: 2 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis: 600 U.S. 570: 3 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island: 517 U.S. 484