Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Labour Court is a South African court that handles labour law cases, that is, disputes arising from the relationship between employer, employee and trade union. The court was established by the Labour Relations Act, 1995 , and has a status similar to that of a division of the High Court .
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) is an independent tribunal which adjudicates labour disputes in South Africa. It was established in November 1996 in terms of Section 112 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, which in turn implements the labour rights provided for in section 23 of the Constitution of South Africa.
A labor court (or labour court or industrial tribunal) is a governmental judiciary body which rules on labor or employment-related matters and disputes. In a number of countries, labor cases are often taken to separate national labor high courts.
Annali Christelle Basson (born 10 October 1960) is a South African judge of the High Court of South Africa.She was appointed to the Gauteng Division in January 2016 after serving in the Labour Court from 2007 to 2016.
The Labour Appeal Court's unanimous decision was handed down by Judge Davis on 26 May 2010. [5] The decision was premised on the court's interpretation of section 23(1) of the Constitution, which provides that "everyone has the right to fair labour practices".
Sindane v Prestige Cleaning Services [1] [2] is an important case in South African law, heard in the Labour Court, Johannesburg, on August 28, 2009. Judge Annali Basson presided. David Sindane, bringing an application in terms of section 191(5)(b)(ii) of the Labour Relations Act, [3] appeared for himself; JH de Villiers Botha appeared for the ...
A 2021 study found that the treadmill is the most effective cardio machine for weight loss. A trainer explains why—and reveals the best treadmill workouts.
The court held that section 186(1)(b) relates to the first expectation only, but the Labour Court later found, in McInnes v Technikon Natal, [54] that its decision in Dierks had been incorrect. It took the view that the focus should be on the nature of the expectation, and whether or not in the circumstances the expectation was reasonable.