Ads
related to: unlocking cell phones illegal in californiaexpressunlocks.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
directunlocks.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As a result, only phones that were purchased before or within 90 days of the effective date could continue to be unlocked by users. Phones purchased more than 90 days past the effective date would again be subject to the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA and could not be legally unlocked without the carrier's permission. [4] [1]
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
The recent ruling that effectively bans third-party phone unlocking has ruffled more than a few feathers, and the people have spoken with their electronic signatures -- 114,322 of them, to be exact.
Bill passes in the US to allow for phone unlocking Enables consumers to unlock their cell phones in order to take them to a carrier that best suits their needs. Forces mobile operators to unlock cell phones [36] 2015: Library of Congress ruled in favor of repair-related exemption in DMCA
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Ads
related to: unlocking cell phones illegal in californiaexpressunlocks.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
directunlocks.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month