Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brazil: The 1988 Brazilian constitution stipulates that: "habeas data shall be granted: a) to ensure the knowledge of information related to the person of the petitioner, contained in records or databanks of government agencies or of agencies of a public character; b) for the correction of data, when the petitioner does not prefer to do so through a confidential process, either judicial or ...
The Organic Law 15/1999 of December 13 on Protection of Personal Data (Spanish: Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal, LOPD) was a Spanish organic law that guaranteed and protected the processing of personal data, public liberties, and fundamental human rights, and especially of personal and family honor and privacy.
In most legal systems of the Spanish-speaking world, the writ of amparo ("writ of protection"; also called recurso de amparo, "appeal for protection", or juicio de amparo, "judgement for protection") is a remedy for the protection of constitutional rights, found in certain jurisdictions. [1]
The Organic Law 3/2018 of December 5 on Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights (Spanish: Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales) is an organic law approved by the Cortes Generales that has the goal of adapting the Spanish domestic law on the General Data Protection Regulation.
The Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de los Particulares (Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Individuals; LFPDPPP), [1] is a law of Mexico, approved by the Mexican Congress on April 27, 2010. The law aims to regulate the right to informational self-determination. The law was published on July 5, 2010 ...
The General Personal Data Protection Law (Portuguese: Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or LGPD; Lei 13709/2018), is a statutory law on data protection and privacy in the Federative Republic of Brazil. [1] The law's primary aim is to unify 40 different Brazilian laws that regulate the processing of personal data. [2]
Republicans refused to hold hearings, consult with habeas experts or negotiate with congressional Democrats. They fast-tracked the bill without a report. [9] The changes to the federal habeas statute mostly applied to reviewing state convictions in federal court, a type of post-conviction relief not available for federal prisoners like McVeigh.
In the Philippines, amparo and habeas data are prerogative writs to supplement the inefficacy of the writ of habeas corpus (Rule 102, Revised Rules of Court). Amparo means 'protection,' while habeas data is 'access to information.' [1] Both writs were conceived to solve the extensive Philippine extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances since 1999.