enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Crime and Human Nature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_and_Human_Nature

    Crime and Human Nature was called "the most important book on crime to appear in a decade" by the law professor John Monahan in 1986. [8] Also in 1986, Michael Nietzel and Richard Milich wrote of the book that "Seldom does a book written by two academicians generate the interest and spark the debate that this one has," noting that by February 1986, it had been reviewed by at least 20 ...

  3. Evolutionary argument against naturalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_argument...

    The evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN) is a philosophical argument asserting a problem with believing both evolution and philosophical naturalism simultaneously. The argument was first proposed by Alvin Plantinga in 1993 and "raises issues of interest to epistemologists , philosophers of mind, evolutionary biologists, and ...

  4. Phillip E. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_E._Johnson

    The "Teach the Controversy" campaign portrays evolution as "a theory in crisis." [citation needed] In his 1997 book Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds Johnson summed up the underlying philosophy of his advocacy for intelligent design and against methodological and philosophical naturalism:

  5. Roy Bhaskar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Bhaskar

    Critical naturalism is the term that Bhaskar used to describe the argument that he develops in his second book The Possibility of Naturalism (1979). [32] He defines naturalism as the view that "social objects can be studied in essentially the same way as natural ones, that is, 'scientifically'". [33]

  6. Argument from reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason

    3. Therefore, if naturalism is true, then no belief is rationally inferred (from 1 and 2). 4. We have good reason to accept naturalism only if it can be rationally inferred from good evidence. 5. Therefore, there is not, and cannot be, good reason to accept naturalism. [1] In short, naturalism undercuts itself.

  7. The Blind Watchmaker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blind_Watchmaker

    The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design is a 1986 book by Richard Dawkins, in which the author presents an explanation of, and argument for, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. He also presents arguments to refute certain criticisms made on his first book, The Selfish Gene.

  8. J. L. Mackie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Mackie

    In his work The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, Mackie makes an analysis of causality by prior philosophers and sets forth his theory of causality based on counterfactual conditionals. He argued that a cause is an " INUS condition " (insufficient but non-redundant parts of a condition which is itself unnecessary but sufficient for ...

  9. À rebours - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/À_rebours

    À rebours (French pronunciation: [a ʁ(ə).buʁ]; translated Against Nature or Against the Grain) is an 1884 novel by the French writer Joris-Karl Huysmans. The narrative centers on a single character: Jean des Esseintes, an eccentric, reclusive, ailing aesthete .