Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Rokkasho plant is the successor to a smaller reprocessing plant that was located in Tōkai, Ibaraki in central Japan which shutdown in 2014 and was approved for decommissioning in 2018. [13] The Rokkasho facilities complex includes: A high level nuclear waste monitoring facility; A MOX fuel fabrication plant; A uranium enrichment plant [14 ...
The first generation Uranium Enrichment Plant in Rokkasho, Aomori operated 1992 to 2010 with a capacity of up to 1,050 ton-SWU/year, which is equivalent to the nuclear fuel used by 8 or 9 reactors at 1,000 MW-class nuclear plants. [1] [2] A second generation plant using centrifuges with composite carbon-fibre rotors started operating in 2011 ...
List of US Reprocessing Plants Name Location Fuel Type Procedure Status Reprocessing capacity (tHM/yr) Construction start date Operation date Closure Purpose Hanford Site: Washington: REDOX, PUREX: Shut down 1944 1988 Military Savannah River Site: South Carolina: LWR PUREX: Shut down 5000 1952 2002 Civil West Valley LWR PUREX: Shut down 300 ...
1979 JCO was founded; 1980 Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. conversion activities were handed over to JCO; 1983 The second factory building at [[Tōkai, Ibaraki|Tokaimura
[38] [39] It has constructed the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant, which could produce further plutonium. [38] Japan has a considerable quantity of highly enriched uranium (HEU), supplied by the U.S. and UK, for use in its research reactors and fast neutron reactor research programs; approximately 1,200 to 1,400 kg of HEU as of 2014. [40]
From 1980 to 2022, the number of all animal processing facilities in Oklahoma declined from 201 to 82, with more than 70% of those closed plants located in tribal areas, according to the USDA’s ...
TOKYO (Reuters) -Panasonic Energy, a unit of Panasonic Holdings, said on Wednesday Oklahoma was no longer a candidate for a new electric vehicle battery plant in the United States. The decision by ...
The cost of non-reprocessing options was estimated to be between a quarter and a third ($5.5–7.9 billion) of the cost of reprocessing ($24.7 billion). At the end of the year 2011 it became clear that Masaya Yasui, who had been director of the Nuclear Power Policy Planning Division in 2004, had instructed his subordinate in April 2004 to ...