Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The teams who play in our tournaments have unanimously agreed to our principles…living within your means is the basis of accounting but it hasn't been the basis of football for years now. The owners are asking for rules because they can't implement them themselves – many of them have had it with shovelling money into clubs and the more ...
The International Fair Play Committee (French: Comité international pour le Fair-Play), abbreviated as the CIFP or the IFPC, is a not for profit international non-governmental organisation which serves to foster sportsmanship in international competition.
This also involves programmes to reduce racism in the game. The programme extends to outside of football, in trying to support charities and other organisations which improve conditions around the world. The principles of the Fair Play programme can be summarised as follows: [4] Play fair (no diving) Play to win but accept defeat with dignity
Pierre de Coubertin World Fair Play Trophy, a special medal handed out for extraordinary acts of sportsmanship, even to one's own detriment; Fair Play Award (disambiguation) Fair Play Trophy (disambiguation) Gamesmanship; Football War; Ultimate (sport) Unsportsmanlike conduct; Unwritten rules of baseball
We promise to take part in these Olympic Games, respecting and abiding by the rules and in the spirit of fair play. We all commit ourselves to sport without doping and cheating. We do this, for the glory of sport, for the honour of our teams and in respect for the Fundamental Principles of Olympism. [15] [6]
FIFA Fair Play Award, a formal recognition of good sportsmanship in association football in general; UEFA Fair Play ranking, a ranking system used by the Union of European Football Associations; UEFA Financial Fair Play Regulations; Fair Play (horse), an American Hall of Fame Thoroughbred racehorse; KK Fair Play, a defunct basketball club in Serbia
For example, if the ultimate point of practicing reciprocity is to produce stable, productive, fair, and reliable social interactions, then there may be some tensions between things that accomplish this general goal and things that satisfy only the other three determinants. Responding to others’ harmful conduct raises this issue.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a party, particularly a corporation, may be subject to the jurisdiction of a state court if it has "minimum contacts" with that state. [1]