Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Licenses to work with depleted uranium in the hull of the M1 Abrams series of tanks may apply to those experimental vehicles, for example 5 vehicles located at the tank school. These documents do not describe whether there was depleted uranium in a particular modification of the tank. M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, Owners' Workshop Manual
First M1 sits at a higher BR than the T-80UD and TURMS tanks NVD (Which usually entails gen1 thermals), is always a tier 4 modification while most other countries’ mbts get thermals as a tier 2 modification. DU armor was refused, no need to elaborate Latest abrams was introduced in 2008, however it uses a 1994 round (M829A2) while a newer round (M829A3) was released in 2003. Armor upgrades ...
M1 Abrams /M1 KVT IPM1 M1A1 M1A1HC / M1A1 Click-Bait M1A1AIM M1A2 M1A2 SEP M1A2 SEP V2. M1 Abrams MBT Technical Data. Crew - 4: Driver, Loader, Gunner and Commander. From ingame Weight - 55.7(M1 variant) —> 66.1 (SEPv2) tonnes. Height - 2.44 meters / 8 feet Hull length - 7.93 meters / 26.02 feet With gun forwards - 9.77 meters / 32.04 feet
the m1 abrams is a perfect example where it was fielded with m774 but it should get m833 for gameplay reasons. 10.3 abrams don’t need a buff at all, they are the best mbt at that br (not counting the obj 292, it belongs to 10.7) Most abrams are powerful in a wide br range, just not top tier
So with the T90M and the introduction of modeled spall liners, there have been a lot of talk about which tanks has it. The Abrams is one of the those tanks that gets talked about a lot. General consensus by the community implies that the Abrams does have a spall liner however from my research, this conclusion is based on assumptions not actual evidence. So in this kinda long first post, In ...
Every m1 Abrams used by the U.S. army starting with the M1A1 HA/HC should have 500-600mm hull front armor vs KE. M1A1 HA development time line 1988-1990 is the same time line of various studies about improvement over existing ceramic armor against full scale kinetic energy threat.
Playing the M1 Abrams is just no fun, it lacks in firepower and armor. Sure it’s fast but only by a bit if you compare it to the Leopard 2A4 for example. The 5 second reload isn’t worth much as most tanks just one shot you or if they don’t then the loader and the 5 seconds reload is gone anyway. So why not just add the M833 to the M1? The penetration is still nowhere close to the ...
It is what it is. iirc as they said that they couldn’t just adjust that from picture alone. They would need at least measurement to be present in the picture. Else they would have to measure bulkhead thickness themself. If they ever get the change. (like they did measure M1 Abrams armor at the museum) So document will have to do for now.
Hello everyone. We’ve noticed that many of you had questions regarding spall liners on tanks and armor in general. To avoid any misunderstandings, we’d like to briefly answer some of these elements below. The effectiveness of the M1 Abrams We’ll soon be releasing a dev blog on the hull armor for the M1 Abrams series of tanks, where we’ll explain why we believe that hull armor was not ...
In M1 Abrams vs T-72 Ural, he uses different estimates of 600 mm (24 in) vs APFSDS and 700 mm (28 in) vs HEAT for the front hull and 800 mm (31 in) vs APFSDS and 1,300 mm (51 in) vs HEAT for the front of the turret.The protection of M1A2 SEP is a frontal turret armor estimate of 940–960 mm (37–38 in) vs APFSDS and 1,320–1,6201,320–1,620 ...