Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On 15 February 2017, The Supreme court overheard the case and convicted all. The order of the special court was restored by the apex court. This ended VK Sasikala's dream to be Chief Minister. Karnataka has sent a bill of Rs 12.04 crore to Tamil Nadu in connection with this case.
The case is also significant for having introduced electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act for the first time in a Court, where a certified copy of the electronic document present on Yahoo server was produced by a private techno legal consultant, not being part of a Government forensic lab, and was accepted as the prime ...
The case was subsequently settled out of court, with Spry Fox gaining ownership of the Yeti Town property by the end of 2012. [11] Since these cases in 2012, legal scholars have found that courts have been more scrutinizing of look-and-feel in cases involving video game clones. [18]
The court relied heavily on the similar case between Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade Inc. in 1992, where the key finding relating to Connectix v. Sony was that copying for the purpose of reverse engineering was within fair use. Each of the four components of fair use were considered by the court individually.
Decisions are binding on the parties and its order is capable of execution through legal process. The following types of cases can be admitted in Lok Adalat. 1. Any dispute or case pending in any court of law in India. Criminal offences which are compoundable. Cases under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Issues relating to recovery of ...
When Breakout-style games for the iPhone began to appear on the App Store in 2008, Atari sent takedown notices to have them removed. [21] In 2017, Atari sued Nestle for using the likeness of Breakout in an ad, replacing the images of bricks with small Kit Kat bars. [22] Building on video game case law such as Atari v. Amusement World (1981 ...
The court cases are categorised into two types - civil and criminal. In 2025, the total number of pending cases of all types and at all levels rose above 52 million or 5.2 crores, including over 180,000 court cases pending for more than 30 years in district and high courts.
Arun Kumar & Anr. versus Inspector General of Registration & Ors. (2019) is a decision of the Madras High Court which recognised trans woman as a "bride" within the meaning of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and prohibited genital-normalizing surgery (referred to as sex reassignment surgery in the case) for intersex infants and children except on life-threatening situations.