Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This article lists the Human Development Index rating of each U.S. state, territory, and federal district according to the UN. All U.S. states and territories have a very high (greater than 0.800) HDI.
Territory [1] HDI Data Year Status Guam 0.901: 2008: Very High human development US Virgin Islands 0.894: 2008: Very High human development Puerto Rico 0.880: 2024: Very High human development
Rank Region Country HDI (2022) Very high human development 1 Massachusetts United States 0.956 New Hampshire United States 3 Colorado United States 0.952 Washington United States 5 Minnesota United States 0.951 6 Connecticut United States 0.950 7 Alberta Canada 0.947 District of Columbia United States Hawaii United States 10
Rank Country HDI 2022 data (2023-2024 report) rankings; Very high human development: 1 Canada: 0.935 2 United States: 0.927 3 Saint Kitts and Nevis: 0.838 4 Antigua and Barbuda: 0.826 5 Bahamas: 0.820 6 Panama: 0.816 7 Trinidad and Tobago: 0.814 8 Barbados: 0.813 9 Costa Rica: 0.811 High human development: 10 Grenada: 0.799
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 14 January 2025. World map of countries or territories by Human Development Index scores in increments of 0.050 (based on 2022 data, published in 2024) ≥ 0.950 0.900–0.950 0.850–0.899 0.800–0.849 0.750–0.799 0.700–0.749 0.650–0.699 0.600–0.649 0.550–0.599 0.500–0.549 0.450–0.499 0. ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 17 January 2025. Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income indices "HDI" redirects here. For other uses, see HDI (disambiguation). For the complete ranking of countries, see List of countries by Human Development Index. World map of countries and territories by HDI scores in ...
This is a list of countries by inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI), as published by the UNDP in its 2024 Human Development Report.According to the 2016 Report, "The IHDI can be interpreted as the level of human development when inequality is accounted for", whereas the Human Development Index itself, from which the IHDI is derived, is "an index of potential human development (or ...
Mississippi ranked last among U.S. states on the American Human Development Index in 2008–2009. The Mississippi State Conference NAACP commissioned Measure of America to apply the methodology of the national report to the state level. A Portrait of Mississippi: Mississippi Human Development Report 2009 was released on January 26, 2009.