Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Good article process is one of Wikipedia's systems for providing a detailed review of an article. Regardless of whether the article meets the criteria, most of the editors of a nominated article appreciate receiving concrete, specific suggestions about how the article could be improved.
Choose an article that you would like to review. Start the review by following the start review link appearing on the GA nominations page or near the top of the article talk page. A new GA review page will be created. You may add opening remarks, an initial review, or one of these templates to the bottom of this review page. [g] Save the page.
Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2.
Featured articles comprise 6,692 out of a total of 6,954,347 articles on the English Wikipedia (about 0.1% or one out of every 1,030 articles). Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at featured article review .
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).
Volunteers will review articles and leave a rating on the Talk page. You can find this by clicking "Talk" at the top right of the article text. The best articles have been evaluated as "Good" or "Featured" articles. These are the best that Wikipedia has to offer, and the rating reflects a shared view of many Wikipedians.
Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles—guidelines for reviewing an article for GA status Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Quality Control/Reviewing Cheatsheet —useful suggestions for GA review Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not —GA reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences
This page contains short guides and advice for reviewing various types of articles as part of new pages patrol.Where the main instructions page focuses on a mechanical view of how to process an article, this page summarizes key things to look out for on specific types of articles, as well as resources and likely outcomes.