Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Students search together collaboratively for scholarly articles and resources Free Zakta [139] Semantic Scholar: Multidisciplinary It is designed to quickly highlight the most important papers and identify the connections between them. It currently includes on computer science and biomedical publications. Free
an academic journal article written two years ago that examines the diary, and; an encyclopedia entry written last year, based on both the book and the journal. Both the proclamation and the diary are primary sources. These primary sources have advantages: they were written at the time, and so are free of the opinions and fictions imposed by ...
Find this article at PubMed Central, a medical database; Find this article in Paperity, a multidisciplinary aggregator of open access journals and papers; Find this article in arXiv, a database of papers in computer science, physics, and mathematics; Find this article in the Digital Commons Network, a multidisciplinary collection of scholarly ...
Once you have found one good scholarly source, you can see what sources it cites and what cited it (citation chaining). This video describes citation chaining using Google Scholar. If you are having trouble accessing a particular source, e.g. due to privacy laws, try this list of ways to get around IP-based restrictions.
Such articles may be based uncritically on a press release, which themselves promote research with uncertain relevance to human health and do not acknowledge important limitations, even when issued by an academic medical center. [30] For Wikipedia's purposes, articles in the popular press are generally considered independent, primary sources. A ...
Therefore, self-published works should be examined carefully when determining whether a specific self-published work is a reliable source for a particular claim in a Wikipedia article. In determining the type of source, there are three separate, basic characteristics to identify: Is the source self-published or not? (This is the topic of this ...
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources. However, some scholarly material may be outdated, in competition with alternative theories, controversial within the relevant field, or largely ignored by the ...