Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Visual representation of the Logarithmic timeline in the scale of the universe. This timeline shows the whole history of the universe, the Earth, and mankind in one table. Each row is defined in years ago, that is, years before the present date, with the earliest times at the top of the chart. In each table cell on the right, references to ...
A logarithmic timeline is a timeline laid out according to a logarithmic scale. This necessarily implies a zero point and an infinity point, neither of which can be displayed. The most natural zero point is the Big Bang, looking forward, but the most common is the ever-changing present, looking backward. (Also possible is a zero point in the ...
He then called the logarithm, with this number as base, the natural logarithm. As noted by Howard Eves, "One of the anomalies in the history of mathematics is the fact that logarithms were discovered before exponents were in use." [16] Carl B. Boyer wrote, "Euler was among the first to treat logarithms as exponents, in the manner now so ...
Timeline from Big Bang to the near cosmological future – Visual representation of the universe's past, present, and future Tiny Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death – Future scenario if the expansion of the universe will continue forever or not - Timeline uses the log scale for comparison with the double-logarithmic scale in this ...
Logarithmic timeline shows all history on one page in ten lines. Orders of magnitude (time) Periodization for a discussion of the tendency to try to fit history into non-overlapping periods. Time. Planck Time
Detailed logarithmic timeline ... Timeline of the Middle Ages – Timeline of events 5th–15th century CE ... Wikipedia® is a registered ...
This is a list of logarithm topics, by Wikipedia page. ... Logarithmic growth; Logarithmic timeline; Log-likelihood ratio; Log-log graph; Log-normal distribution;
By the nature of a logarithmic timeline, the last row covers the shortest period (say, one year). The second-but-last row, if we're going to stick with the unintuitive 10^0.1, will then be 1.26 years. This is supposed to be a logarithmic timescale, so it should be done properly (or not at all). --dab 13:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)