Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Published since 1 January 1986, the S&P BSE SENSEX is regarded as the pulse of the domestic stock markets in India. [2] [3] The base value of the SENSEX was taken as 100 on 1 April 1979 and its base year as 1978–79. On 25 July 2001 BSE launched DOLLEX-, a dollar-linked version of the SENSEX. [4]
The list of all companies that have been included in the BSE SENSEX from its inception in 1986 are listed below. The base year of SENSEX is 1978–79 with a base value of 100. During the introduction of the SENSEX in 1986, some of the companies included in the base calculation in 1979 were removed and new companies were added.
Trading was suspended for one hour at the Bombay Stock Exchange after the benchmark Sensex crashed to a low of 15,576.30 within minutes of opening, crossing the circuit limit of 10 per cent. On 11 Feb 2008, the Sensex fell by a further 834 points to 16,630. On 3 March 2008, the Sensex fell by 900 points to settle at 16,677.
BSE Limited, also known as the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), is an Indian stock exchange which is located on Dalal Street. [8] Established with the efforts of cotton merchant Premchand Roychand in 1875, [9] [10] it is the oldest stock exchange in Asia, [11] and also the tenth oldest in the world. [12]
From January 2008 to June 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Stephen F. Page joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 15.7 percent return on your investment, compared to a -12.9 percent return from the S&P 500.
From July 2012 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Jody L. Freeman joined the board, and sold them when she left, you would have a 4.1 percent return on your investment, compared to a 4.4 percent return from the S&P 500.
Lululemon’s (LULU) growth has been flagging in its core US market. CEO Calvin McDonald is working on turning that around. The athleisure brand reported third quarter US revenue was unchanged, in ...
Since the Great Recession of 2008 households in the bottom half of the income distribution have lessened their participation rate both directly and indirectly from 53.2% in 2007 to 48.8% in 2013, while over the same period households in the top decile of the income distribution slightly increased participation 91.7% to 92.1%. [17]