Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Morgan County real estate agent has been federally indicted on charges of fraud and money laundering after he got nearly $170,000 in bank loans under false pretenses so that he could pay back ...
Often, these transactions take advantage of uninformed, low-income homeowners; because of the complexity of the transaction, victims are often unaware that they are giving away their property and equity. [citation needed] Several states have taken steps to confront the more unscrupulous practices of equity stripping. Although "foreclosure re ...
A breakthrough in alleged real estate fraud case against the ‘King of Coconut Grove’ ... As an example of Cox’s juggling act, the townhouse at 2960 Coconut Ave. has had four contracts on it ...
Tom Cronkright, co-founder and executive chairman of real estate fraud protection company CertifID, said that while wire fraud is an overall pervasive issue across the country, it is particularly ...
Equity stripping or equity skimming is a variation on lease-buyback and is one of the most common types of foreclosure rescue schemes. [4] In it, the perpetrator assumes ownership of the house while allowing the former owner to continue living there, provided that s/he pay rent to the perpetrator, who is the new owner.
Mortgage fraud by borrowers from US Department of the Treasury [7]. Mortgage fraud may be perpetrated by one or more participants in a loan transaction, including the borrower; a loan officer who originates the mortgage; a real estate agent, appraiser, a title or escrow representative or attorney; or by multiple parties as in the example of the fraud ring described above.
The ultimate victim of a real estate Ponzi scheme mastermind, who allegedly defrauded millions of dollars from his clients, could turn out to be his own wife of 38 years. The lesson for homeowners ...
It is important to note that the actual distinction between the two different types of fraud is what the intentions of the debtor were. For example, where the debtor has simply been more generous than they should have or, in business transactions, the business should have ceased trading earlier to preserve capital (see generally, wrongful trading).