Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This template is placed after a reference to a predatory journal. It identifies it as an unreliable source . Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox ( create | mirror ) and testcases ( create ) pages.
This template holds a list of predatory open access journals and publishers for MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-predatory, so that it can be edited by non-administrators. It should always be kept synchronized with Special:AbuseFilter/891.
Pages in this category have references to a predatory journal, identifying it as an unreliable source. Articles can be added to this category by using the {{ Predatory publisher }} template. Pages in category "Articles with sources from predatory publications"
Academic Journals This template is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Various journal review websites (crowd-sourced or expert-run) have been started, some focusing on the quality of the peer review process and extending to non-OA publications. [127] [128] A group of libraries and publishers launched an awareness campaign. [129] [130] A number of measures have been suggested to further combat predatory journals.
A journal article is probably not reliable for biomedical claims if its publisher has a reputation for exhibiting "predatory" behavior, which includes questionable business practices and/or peer-review processes that raise concerns about the reliability of their journal articles. (See also WP:RS#Predatory journals and the #References section ...
The peer review provided by PLOS ONE was reported to be the most rigorous of all, and it was the only journal that identified the paper's ethical problems, for example the lack of documentation of how animals were treated in the creation of the cancer cell lines. [2]
The International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology (IJACT) is a publication which has been described as a predatory open access journal [1] [2] [3] —a publication which has some of the surface attributes of a benign open access journal but is actually an exploitative and deceptive corruption of that model, operating as a disreputable vanity press with little scholarly value.