Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Worn books at the library of Merton College, Oxford. For archival criteria, the following are evidence of significance: uniqueness, irreplaceability, high level of impact – over time or place, high level of influence, representation of a type, and; comparative value (rarity, completeness, integrity relative to others of its kind). [28]
Archival research lies at the heart of most academic and other forms of original historical research; but it is frequently also undertaken (in conjunction with parallel research methodologies) in other disciplines within the humanities and social sciences, including literary studies, rhetoric, [4] [5] archaeology, sociology, human geography, anthropology, psychology, and organizational studies ...
Library science (previously termed library studies and library economy) [note 1] is an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary field that applies the practices, perspectives, and tools of management, information technology, education, and other areas to libraries; the collection, organization, preservation, and dissemination of information resources; and the political economy of information.
An archive is an accumulation of historical records or materials – in any medium – or the physical facility in which they are located. [1] [2]Archives contain primary source documents that have accumulated over the course of an individual or organization's lifetime, and are kept to show the history and function of that person or organization.
Archives represent the activities of a person, family or organization that are created and accumulated naturally in the course of their ordinary activities. [10] In contrast to the items in a library, therefore, all the items in an archival collection share a relationship. [2]
Archival science, or archival studies, is the study and theory of building and curating archives, which are collections of documents, recordings, photographs and various other materials in physical or digital formats. To build and curate an archive, one must acquire and evaluate the materials, and be able to access them later.
Kate Theimer writes that in order to understand Archives 2.0, it must be compared against Archives 1.0. She asserts that her representation of Archives 1.0 is by no means exhaustive or fully comprehensive of the breadth of archival experience. The following is a list of contrasts between 1.0 and 2.0. [71] "Open, not closed; Transparent, not opaque;
DACS consists of two parts: Part I, Describing Archival Materials, and Part II, Archival Authority Records. [3] DACS is concerned with providing a framework for creating useful tools for researchers in archives through the description of records, historical agents, historical activities, and the relationships between them. [4]