enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Defamation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    Defamation is a communication that injures a third party's reputation and causes a legally redressable injury. The precise legal definition of defamation varies from country to country. It is not necessarily restricted to making assertions that are falsifiable, and can extend to concepts that are more abstract than reputation – like dignity ...

  3. False statement of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statement_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  4. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Truth is an absolute defense against defamation in the United States, [1] meaning true statements cannot be defamatory. [ 2 ] Most states recognize that some categories of false statements are considered to be defamatory per se , such that people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that the statement caused them ...

  5. English defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law

    A defamatory statement is presumed to be false, unless the defendant can prove its truth. English defamation law puts the burden of proof on the defendant, and does not require the plaintiff to prove falsehood. For that reason, it has been considered an impediment to free speech in much of the developed world.

  6. Actual malice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice

    The Supreme Court adopted the actual malice standard in its landmark 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, [2] in which the Warren Court held that: . The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a Federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with ...

  7. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    The Court said that because of these core American free-speech principles, it would have to consider Sullivan's defamation claims "against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes ...

  8. Speech crimes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_crimes

    In the United States the right to free speech is in the Bill of Rights.Words are expressions of ideas, and allow freedom of individuality. [3] [non-primary source needed] To Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, it was of the utmost importance to keep all speech free in order for the truth to emerge and to have a civil society. [4]

  9. Opinion privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_privilege

    Opinion privilege is a protected form of speech, of importance to US federal and state law.The US First Amendment guarantees free speech, subject to certain limitations.One of these limitations is defamation, in various forms, notably libel.