enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Voting rights groups ask to dismiss lawsuit challenging ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/voting-rights-groups-ask...

    The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Ohio and others, told the Ohio Supreme Court that they are willing to live with the U.S. House map approved ...

  3. Ohio court dismisses lawsuit over state’s election maps, set ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/ohio-court-dismisses...

    The first case centered on redistricting maps that were crafted after the 2020 Census. The first set of maps was tossed… Ohio court dismisses lawsuit over state’s election maps, set to keep ...

  4. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections...

    Ohio Elections Commission. Margaret McIntyre died while the case was still being litigated in the state courts. On behalf of Joseph McIntyre, the executor of McIntyre's estate, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which the Court granted on February 22, 1994.

  5. Statehouse maps cleared for 2024 use after Ohio Supreme ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/redistricting-statehouse-maps...

    Republicans on the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed legal challenges to state House and Senate maps Monday, allowing the plan to take effect through 2030.. The court's four Republican justices, led by ...

  6. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies not only to the federal government but also to the state governments.

  7. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of U.S. Supreme Court cases involving Native American Tribes.Included in the list are Supreme Court cases that have a major component that deals with the relationship between tribes, between a governmental entity and tribes, tribal sovereignty, tribal rights (including property, hunting, fishing, religion, etc.) and actions involving members of tribes.

  9. Ohio Politics Explained: A redistricting lawsuit and failed ...

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-politics-explained...

    This week we explain the lawsuit filed over Ohio's new Congressional districts, attempted election fraud and a civil suit in the House Bill 6 scandal.