enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Michigan Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Supreme_Court

    Each year, the Court receives approximately 2,000 new case filings. In most cases, the litigants seek review of Michigan Court of Appeals decisions, but the Supreme Court also hears cases of attorney misconduct (through a bifurcated disciplinary system comprising an investigation and prosecution agency – the Attorney Grievance Commission – and a separate adjudicative agency – the ...

  3. Default judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_judgment

    Default judgment is a binding judgment in favor of either party based on some failure to take action by the other party. Most often, it is a judgment in favor of a plaintiff when the defendant has not responded to a summons or has failed to appear before a court of law. The failure to take action is the default. The default judgment is the ...

  4. Gratz v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratz_v._Bollinger

    Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points towards admission to ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Year Decided Holding Voting Dred Scott v. Sandford: 1857: Held that people of African ancestry (whether free or not) were not United States Citizens, and therefore lacked standing to sue. This ruling stood as precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 7–2 Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co ...

  6. Appellate procedure in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the...

    In some cases, an appellant may successfully argue that the law under which the lower decision was rendered was unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, or may convince the higher court to order a new trial on the basis that evidence earlier sought was concealed or only recently discovered. In the case of new evidence, there must be a high ...

  7. Subject-matter jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject-matter_jurisdiction

    Subject-matter jurisdiction, also called jurisdiction ratione materiae, [1] is a legal doctrine regarding the ability of a court to lawfully hear and adjudicate a case. . Subject-matter relates to the nature of a case; whether it is criminal, civil, whether it is a state issue or a federal issue, and other substantive features of th

  8. Judge strikes down law allowing Tennessee attorney general to ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-strikes-down-law-allowing...

    The new law allows the attorney general to step in and take over post-conviction capital cases. The state attorney general is an appointed position, not elected.

  9. Civil discovery under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_discovery_under...

    Section 15 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided: [A]ll the said courts of the United States, shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the ...

  1. Related searches mi scao default request sum certain cases list of action based evidence

    michigan supreme court orderssupreme court of michigan