Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This interpretation of the baseline hazard as "hazard of a baseline subject" is imperfect, as the covariate being 0 is impossible in this application: a P/E of 0 is meaningless (it means the company's stock price is 0, i.e., they are "dead"). A more appropriate interpretation would be "the hazard when all variables are nil".
In survival analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) is the ratio of the hazard rates corresponding to the conditions characterised by two distinct levels of a treatment variable of interest. For example, in a clinical study of a drug, the treated population may die at twice the rate of the control population.
This approach performs well for certain measures and can approximate arbitrary hazard functions relatively well, while not imposing stringent computational requirements. [5] When the covariates are omitted from the analysis, the maximum likelihood boils down to the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivor function. [6]
When used as part of an aviation hazard analysis, a "Likelihood" is a specific probability. It is the joint probability of a hazard occurring, that hazard causing or contributing to an aircraft accident or incident, and the resulting degree of loss or harm falling within one of the defined severity categories.
In full generality, the accelerated failure time model can be specified as [2] (|) = ()where denotes the joint effect of covariates, typically = ([+ +]). (Specifying the regression coefficients with a negative sign implies that high values of the covariates increase the survival time, but this is merely a sign convention; without a negative sign, they increase the hazard.)
Where to shop today's best deals: Kate Spade, Amazon, Walmart and more
If the hazard ratio is , there are total subjects, is the probability a subject in either group will eventually have an event (so that is the expected number of events at the time of the analysis), and the proportion of subjects randomized to each group is 50%, then the logrank statistic is approximately normal with mean () and variance 1. [4]
From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when William J. Ryan joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a -30.6 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.