Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Result after a CPU benchmark ("CPU Profile") 3DMark is a computer benchmarking tool created and developed by UL (formerly Futuremark), to determine the performance of a computer's 3D graphic rendering and CPU workload processing capabilities. Running 3DMark produces a 3DMark score, with higher numbers indicating better performance.
The PCMark Suite is a collection of various single- and multi-threaded CPU, Graphics and HDD test sets with the focus on Windows Vista application tests. Consumer Scenario Suites are pre-defined selections of test sets that measure the system’s performance in respective Windows Vista Consumer Scenarios. PCMark Score; PCMark Memories Score
System designers building parallel computers, such as Google's hardware, pick CPUs based on their performance per watt of power, because the cost of powering the CPU outweighs the cost of the CPU itself. [2] Spaceflight computers have hard limits on the maximum power available and also have hard requirements on minimum real-time performance.
Free/open source (GPL) or proprietary AMD CodeXL by AMD: Linux, Windows For GPU profiling and debugging: OpenCL. A tool suite for GPU profiling, GPU debugger and a static kernel analyzer. Free/open source (MIT) AMD uProf by AMD: Linux, Windows C, C++, .NET, Java, Fortran Code profiler, does sampling based profiling on AMD processors. Proprietary
A graphical demo running as a benchmark of the OGRE engine. In computing, a benchmark is the act of running a computer program, a set of programs, or other operations, in order to assess the relative performance of an object, normally by running a number of standard tests and trials against it.
The 3DMark series has been the company's most popular and successful to date. Futuremark's applications are distributed via the Internet as well as offline media. In addition to its benchmarking software, the company has also provided services such as IHV/ISV customised benchmarks, 3D demos as well as online and data services.
In 2013, the usefulness of the scores from earlier versions of Geekbench (up to version 3) was heavily disputed by Linus Torvalds in an online forum. Linus' concerns that Geekbench combined disparate benchmarks into a single score [ 10 ] were addressed in Geekbench 4 by splitting integer, floating point, and crypto into sub-scores.
1×10 −1: multiplication of two 10-digit numbers by a 1940s electromechanical desk calculator [1]; 3×10 −1: multiplication on Zuse Z3 and Z4, first programmable digital computers, 1941 and 1945 respectively