Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Men ordinarily subject to penal military unit service included: Those convicted of desertion or cowardice under Order No. 227. While cowardice under fire was sometimes punished with instant execution, soldiers or officers in rear areas suspected of having a "reluctance to fight" could (and frequently were) summarily stripped of rank and reassigned to a shtrafbat under Order 227.
3 years: 2 years: $100 D More than 5 years and less than 10 years: $250,000: 3 years: 2 years: $100 E More than 1 year and less than 5 years: $250,000: 1 year: 1 year: $100 Misdemeanor A More than 6 months and less than 1 year: $100,000: 0-5 years: 1 year: 1 year: $25 B More than 30 days and less than 6 months: $5,000: 1 year: 1 year: $10 C ...
Penalties in English law are contractual terms which are not enforceable in the courts because of their penal character. [1] Since at least 1720 [2] it has been accepted as a matter of English contract law that if a provision in a contract constitutes a penalty, then that provision is unenforceable by the parties. However, the test for what ...
3 (Pledger v Janssen, et al.) APPEARANCES: (Continued) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP BY: DIANE P. SULLIVAN, ESQUIRE ALLISON BROWN, ESQUIRE (admitted pro hac vice) 301 Carnegie Center, Suite 303 Princeton, New Jersey 08540 T: 609-986-1100 F: 212-310-8007 E-mail: diane.sullivan@weil.com E-mail: allison.brown@weil.com Counsel for Defendant Janssen 4
1 reason it's a problem is because it's not 2 filtered. 3 See, here we have evidence that comes 4 in and then it gets filtered by the Rules of 5 Evidence and I -- we get to apply some laws 6 to it, and then you consider that as 7 filtered. Not so when it's on the Internet. 8 We don't know what you're reading there. 9 Some of it's true, but a ...
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
1 of 60 sheets Page 1 to 4 of 167 09/25/2012 12:19:02 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ...
By a person who thought (in culpable error) that one of the circumstances mentioned in Canon 1323, numbers 4 or 5 was present; By a person who, without negligence, did not know that a penalty was attached to a law or precept; By a person who acted without full imputability, provided that the imputability was grave. [25]